why doesn't have this list a "reply-to" ?
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Wed Oct 17 00:49:12 CEST 2007
Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> writes:
> It's not universal. Many people consider it harmful. Google
> "reply-to considered harmful" for a variety of opinions, for and
The arguments in support of munging have been defeated, since
2001. Munging the "Reply-To" field is in violation of standards, and
completely unnecessary. Any remaining lack is for the mail user agent
provider to fix, in accordance with standards.
\ "I wrote a song, but I can't read music so I don't know what it |
`\ is. Every once in a while I'll be listening to the radio and I |
_o__) say, 'I think I might have written that.'" -- Steven Wright |
More information about the Python-list