Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks
nytrokiss at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 12:26:34 CEST 2007
But the question is when will the cheap hosting company's start to host
normal python files!
On 10/7/07, genro <giovanni.porcari at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Michele Simionato <michele.simion... at gmail.com>
> > On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
> > > Michele Simionato a écrit :
> > > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have
> > > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a
> > > > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the
> > > > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?)
> > > Can't tell, but I'd trust the Pylons team on this kind of choices.
> > > They're doing good job so far AFAICT.
> > Probably Beaker works well, but it is certainly NOT doing things
> > as Eby recommends:
> > http://dirtsimple.org/2007/02/wsgi-middleware-considered-harmful.html
> > BTW, I know that Eby is asking opinions about WSGI 2.0 on the
> > WSGI SIG and interested people may have a look there.
> > Michele Simionato
> I think that Beaker is a Mako dependency.
> So if you use Mako, Beaker is not an option :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list