The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding
dak at gnu.org
Wed Oct 3 11:28:18 CEST 2007
bcd at pvv.ntnu.no (Bent C Dalager) writes:
> In article <fdtsfu$iq6$03$1 at news.t-online.com>,
> Frank Goenninger <frgo at goenninger.net> wrote:
>>Well, I didn't start the discussion. So you should ask the OP about the
>>why. I jumped in when I came across the so often mentioned "hey, it's
>>all well defined" statement was brought in. I simply said that if that
>>"well-definedness" is against "common understanding" then I don't give
>>a damn about that clever definitions. Because I have to know that there
>>are such definitions - always also knowing that free is not really
> "Liberated" is a valid meaning of the word "free".
No. It is a valid meaning of the word "freed".
Xpost+Fup2 gnu.misc.discuss: this is not really relevant for most of
the touched Usenet groups.
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
More information about the Python-list