Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

genro giovanni.porcari at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 11:33:56 CEST 2007


On Oct 7, 8:35 am, Michele Simionato <michele.simion... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
>
> > Michele Simionato a écrit :
>
> > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have
> > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a
> > > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the
> > > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?)
>
> > Can't tell, but I'd trust the Pylons team on this kind of choices.
> > They're doing good job so far AFAICT.
>
> Probably Beaker works well, but it is certainly NOT doing things
> as Eby recommends:
>
> http://dirtsimple.org/2007/02/wsgi-middleware-considered-harmful.html
>
> BTW, I know that Eby is asking opinions about WSGI 2.0 on the
> WSGI SIG and interested people may have a look there.
>
>            Michele Simionato


I think that Beaker is a Mako dependency.
So if you use Mako, Beaker is not an option  :)

G




More information about the Python-list mailing list