shouldn't 'string'.find('ugh') return 0, not -1 ?
Looney, James B
james.b.looney at lmco.com
Wed Oct 31 16:04:19 CET 2007
I believe most programming languages evaluate 0 to mean False, and
anything else to be True (for the purposes of boolean evaluation).
Python is no exception.
From: python-list-bounces+james.b.looney=lmco.com at python.org
[mailto:python-list-bounces+james.b.looney=lmco.com at python.org] On
Behalf Of jelle feringa
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Luis Zarrabeitia
Cc: python-list at python.org
Subject: Re: shouldn't 'string'.find('ugh') return 0, not -1 ?
There is a subtle point though.
If the substring is not found '_'.find(' '), will return -1
Semanticly, I was expecting the that if the substring was not
found, the conditional statement would not be found.
However, python evaluates -1 to True, so that is what I do find
So, I was arguing that '_'.find(' ') might return 0, however
that is obviously ambigious, since 0 might be an index as well.
So, perhaps I should rephrase and ask, why if -1 evaluates to
I think that's pretty ugly...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list