super() doesn't get superclass

[Ben Finney]

aleax at mac.com (Alex Martelli) writes:

> In general, "a superclass of foo" means "a class X such that foo is a
> sublass of X"

Sure. However, this doesn't equate to the assertion that "next class
in the MRO is the superclass", which is what I was responding to.

-- 
 \       "Even if the voices in my head are not real, they have pretty |
  `\                                           good ideas." —anonymous |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney