Python 3.0 migration plans?

[Chris Mellon]

On 9/28/07, TheFlyingDutchman <zzbbaadd at aol.com> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2:49 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de... at nospam.web.de> wrote:
> > TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> >

> > All serious languages are turing-complete. So can we put away with this
> > non-sense argument right away, please?
>
> You said it was a most basic language feature. I still haven't heard
> anything that leads me to believe that statement is correct. What
> languages implemented decorators as a most basic language feature?
> Python didn't have them for over a decade so it doesn't qualify.
>

Decorators are syntax sugar for higher order functions. Higher order
functions are a both a basic and a fundamental language feature, and
exist in many languages. The fact that you don't know this just
proves, once again, that you like to talk more than you like to learn.