Why prefer != over <> for Python 3.0?

Konstantin Veretennicov kveretennicov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 20:50:49 CEST 2008

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Gabriel Genellina <gagsl-py2 at yahoo.com.ar>

> En Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:15:57 -0300, Jorge Vargas <jorge.vargas at gmail.com>
> escribió:
> > as for the original question, the point of going unicode is not to
> > make code unicode, but to make code's output unicode. thin of print
> > calls and templates and comments the world's complexity in languages.
> > sadly most english speaking people think unicode is irrelevant because
> > ASCII has everything, but their narrow world is what's wrong.
> Python 3 is a good step in that direction. Strings are unicode,
> identifiers are not restricted to ASCII, and the default source encoding
> is not ASCII anymore (but I don't remember which one).

UTF-8 (http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-3120/)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20080401/93ccf67a/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-list mailing list