marco at sferacarta.com
Wed Apr 16 15:16:27 CEST 2008
Aaron Watters wrote:
> stuff out there you can get so easily -- all the stuff that py3k
> will break -- most of which won't get ported -- and if it does can
> we be sure it will be tested properly? No, probably you will end
> up beta testing someone's quick port of what used to be rock
> solid code... This was quite rightly pointed out to me, and
> I had to agree that it was a pretty good point.
Do you mean Ruby's track in providing backward compatibility is better
Googling for that a bit, I would reckon otherwise.
More information about the Python-list