property() usage - is this as good as it gets?
Bruno Desthuilliers
bruno.42.desthuilliers at websiteburo.invalid
Tue Aug 26 04:30:04 EDT 2008
David Moss a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I want to manage and control access to several important attributes in
> a class and override the behaviour of some of them in various
> subclasses.
>
> Below is a stripped version of how I've implemented this in my current
> bit of work.
>
> It works well enough, but I can't help feeling there a cleaner more
> readable way of doing this (with less duplication, etc).
>
> Is this as good as it gets or can this be refined and improved
> especially if I was to add in a couple more attributes some fairly
> complex over-ride logic?
(snip code)
Remember that properties have nothing magical - they're just one
possible (and very handy) way to use the descriptor protocol to
implement computed attributes. If you have to resort to any non-obvious
trick or just too much boilerplate code with properties, then it's
probably time to implementent your own custom descriptor object.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list