Bizarre method keyword-arg bug.
bbrown at speakeasy.net
Wed Aug 20 21:58:44 CEST 2008
Steven D'Aprano <steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:09:21 -0400, Robert Brown wrote:
>> In any case, chances are high that Lisp's way of handling default
>> arguments would have been changed had it been shown to cause performance
> But nobody is suggesting that it would cause performance problems in
> *Lisp*. It might, or it might not. Who cares? We're not talking about
> Lisp, we're talking about *Python*, and evaluating default arguments
> every time the function is called would certainly cause a performance hit
> in Python.
Please explain why it's a performance problem for Python but not for other
More information about the Python-list