Is my thinking Pythonic?
bruno.42.desthuilliers at websiteburo.invalid
Fri Aug 22 11:20:53 CEST 2008
Fredrik Lundh a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> Unless you have a really good reason to use an antiquated and
>> deprecated object model, use "new-style" classes (for a value of "new"
>> being "now many years old"):
> the distinction is gone in 3.0,
Yeps, but not in 2.5.2, which is still the current stable release.
> so can we please stop flaming people
Hear hear... Now *this* is a very sound advice.
> violating a crap rule that's quite often pointless in 2.X and completely
> pointless in 3.0?
Given the lack of proper support for the descriptor protocol in
old-style classes and a couple other diverging behaviors, I wouldn't say
that advising newcomers to use new-style classes is so pointless.
More information about the Python-list