Replace Several Items
Steven D'Aprano
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Wed Aug 13 21:54:55 EDT 2008
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:50:29 +0000, Wojtek Walczak wrote:
> Dnia Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:31:00 +0200, Fredrik Lundh napisa³(a):
>
>>>> if ch in my_string:
>>>> my_string = my_string.replace(ch, "")
>>>>
>>>> on representative data.
>>>
>>> I don't have to, I can anticipate the results.
>>
>> Chances are that you're wrong.
>
> At the moment my average is about 0.75 of mistake per post on
> comp.lang.python (please, bare with me ;-)). I strongly believe that the
> statement I made above won't make this number rise.
>
> :)
Okay, is this going to be one of those things where, no matter what the
benchmarks show, you say "I was right, I *did* anticipate the results. I
just anticipated them correctly/incorrectly."?
If so, you get an A+ in pedantry and F- in usefulness *wink*
In full knowledge that Python is relatively hard to guess what is fast
compared to what is slow, I'll make my guess of fastest to slowest:
1. repeated replace
2. repeated use of the form
"if ch in my_string: my_string = my_string.replace(ch, "")
3. re.sub with literal replacement
4. re.sub with callback (lambda m: "")
Results to follow.
--
Steven
More information about the Python-list
mailing list