Which is faster?
Steven D'Aprano
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Sat Aug 30 02:15:30 EDT 2008
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:26:35 -0700, cnb wrote:
> def averageGrade(self):
> tot = 0
> for review in self.reviews:
> tot += review.grade
> return tot / len(self.reviews)
>
> def av_grade(self):
> return sum(review.grade for review in self.reviews) / \
> len(self.reviews)
Re-writing the functions so they can be tested alone:
def averageGrade(alist):
tot = 0.0
for x in alist:
tot += x
return tot/len(alist)
def av_grade(alist):
return sum(alist)/len(alist)
>>> from timeit import Timer
>>> # small amount of items
... alist = range(100)
>>> Timer('averageGrade(alist)',
... 'from __main__ import alist, averageGrade').repeat(number=100000)
[3.9559240341186523, 3.4910569190979004, 3.4856188297271729]
>>>
>>> Timer('av_grade(alist)',
... 'from __main__ import alist, av_grade').repeat(number=100000)
[2.0255107879638672, 1.0968310832977295, 1.0733180046081543]
The version with sum() is much faster. How about with lots of data?
>>> alist = xrange(1000000)
>>> Timer('averageGrade(alist)',
... 'from __main__ import alist, averageGrade').repeat(number=50)
[17.699107885360718, 18.182793140411377, 18.651514053344727]
>>>
>>> Timer('av_grade(alist)',
... 'from __main__ import alist, av_grade').repeat(number=50)
[17.125216007232666, 15.72636890411377, 16.309713840484619]
sum() is still a little faster.
--
Steven
More information about the Python-list
mailing list