Is my thinking Pythonic?

[Fredrik Lundh]

Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:

> Unless you have a really good reason to use an antiquated and deprecated 
> object model, use "new-style" classes (for a value of "new" being "now 
> many years old"):

the distinction is gone in 3.0, so can we please stop flaming people for 
violating a crap rule that's quite often pointless in 2.X and completely 
pointless in 3.0?

</F>