confused about __str__ vs. __repr__
robert.kern at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 22:27:17 CET 2008
Mikael Olofsson wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>> Yep. And it's easy enough if you don't care about them being different..
>> def __repr__(self):
>> return str(self)
> If I ever wanted __str__ and __repr__ to return the same thing, I would
> make them equal:
> def __str__(self):
> return 'whatever you want'
> __repr__ = __str__
> That makes it more obvious to me what's going on. As a bonus, it saves
> one method call for every repr call.
Or just define __repr__(). str() falls back to __repr__() if __str__() is not
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Python-list