thomasmallen at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 22:17:03 CET 2008
Here's my problem (it's a conceptual one). Coming from the world of
mod_php, each file can represent a page with no intervention. I was
not able to achieve the same with mod_python when I tried, and for
that matter, couldn't put the pieces together in a usable way.
Let me start simply: If I wanted to create a trivial site, (Home,
About, Contact) with a header and footer included, in PHP, it would be
done as such: each page (index.php, about.php, contact.php) includes
the template bits (header.php, footer.php). Is this simplicity
achievable using Python? And by "simplicity," I'm referring to
simplicity in execution; not necessarily an identical approach.
On Dec 17, 4:25 am, Graham Dumpleton <Graham.Dumple... at gmail.com>
> On Dec 17, 11:10 am, Дамјан Георгиевски <gdam... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm trying again because I'm stubborn. Maybe the fourth time will be
> > > the charm...
> > > Are there any good tutorials out there for setting up Apache with
> > > mod_python?
> > mod_python is depreceated, nobody uses it. usemod_wsgihttp://www.modwsgi.org/
> The mod_python package is not deprecated, although it could be said to
> be sleeping at the moment. You'll also probably still find that more
> new people choose mod_python over mod_wsgi. This is because it has the
> more obvious name to look for when Googling. It also has publisher and
> PSP high level handler which are still attractive to many as they are
> more lightweight and easier to get into than the large WSGI
> frameworks. Finally, the Django folks still recommend in their
> documentation to use mod_python.
> Anyway, if wanting to host a WSGI capable application, using mod_wsgi
> would be the more obvious choice. If wanting to write your own
> framework, or work at low level, basing it on WSGI rather than
> mod_python specific APIs would certainly be a better long term
> direction to take.
More information about the Python-list