"as" keyword woes
Alan G Isaac
aisaac at american.edu
Thu Dec 4 21:15:22 CET 2008
Warren DeLano wrote:
> what I can't understand is the decision to break 2.6 instead of 3.0. 2.x was
> supposed to remain backwards compatible, with the thinking that 2.x
> would be maintained in parallel for quite some time. 3.x was supposed
> to be the compatibility break.
I do not understand why anyone would object
to this perfectly cogent complaint of Warren's.
Even if the deprecation warnings had not been
invisible, the complaint would be valid.
More information about the Python-list