SQL, lite lite lite
Ned Deily
nad at acm.org
Mon Dec 29 13:46:11 EST 2008
In article <FAD72DE8-D584-4530-A018-5956428CD119 at semanchuk.com>,
Philip Semanchuk <philip at semanchuk.com> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Aaron Brady wrote:
> > I don't think relational data can be read and written very easily in
> > Python. There are some options, such as 'sqllite3', but they are not
> > easy. 'sqllite3' statements are valid SQL expressions, which afford
> > the entire power of SQL, but contrary to its name, it is not that
> > 'lite'. To me, 'lite' is something you could learn (even make!) in an
> > afternoon, not a semester; something the size of an ActiveState
> > recipe, or a little bigger, maybe a file or two.
> [...]
> After a look at the syntax you're proposing, I wonder how you feel it
> differs from ORMs like SQLAlchemy (for instance).
... and Elixir, a declarative layer on top of SQLAlchemy:
<http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/wiki/TutorialDivingIn>
--
Ned Deily,
nad at acm.org
More information about the Python-list
mailing list