"Patrick Mullen" <saluk64007 at gmail.com> writes: >> f1(...): >> "Docstring f1" >> c = C() >> return c.f1(...) >> >> f2(...): >> "Docstring f2" >> c = C() >> return c.f2(...) > > Why not just do either this: > C().f2(..) where you need f2 Yes, this is a little better. Thanks!