New Python 3.0 string formatting - really necessary?
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Sat Dec 20 20:19:03 EST 2008
In article
<6b4176c3-49ce-4e7c-bced-07d8d19bc0f4 at s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
r <rt8396 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You can't just blindly Parrot off.. "well CPU's get faster every
> year".
Sure you can :-) There was a nice treatment of this on slashdot today
(http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001198.html). The executive
summary is I'm willing to accept that Python is (big handwave) 10x slower
than C++, because *I'm* 10x faster writing in Python than I am in C++, and
I cost more than my computer.
Moore's laws says (small handwave) CPU speed doubles every 24 months. At
that rate, and assuming I remember enough high-school algebra to solve a
compound interest problem, hardware gets 10% faster every 3 months. If
Python gets 10% slower every 10 years or so, it's ahead of the curve.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list