multiprocessing vs thread performance

[Philip Semanchuk]

On Dec 31, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:

> Aaron Brady <castironpi at gmail.com> writes:
>> I had an idea.  You could use 'multiprocessing' for synchronization,
>> and just use an mmap for the actual communication.  (I think it's a
>> good idea.)
>
> Are you reinventing POSH?  (http://poshmodule.sourceforge.net)

Or sysv_ipc? Or posix_ipc?

http://semanchuk.com/philip/sysv_ipc/
http://semanchuk.com/philip/posix_ipc/

Bug fix version of the latter coming out in a day or two...