future multi-threading for-loops

Boris Borcic bborcic at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 10:47:09 CET 2008

castironpi at gmail.com wrote:
> On Feb 5, 12:26 am, Gabriel Genellina <gagsl-... at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
>> On 5 feb, 03:46, castiro... at gmail.com wrote:
>>> Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2.
>>> Are threads an OS bottleneck?
>> I don't understand your threading issues, but I would not use 3.0a2
>> for benchmarking anything (except benchmarking Python 3.0 itself).
>> AFAIK the developers are first trying to get it right and stable;
>> speed issues will be addressed later.
>> --
>> Gabriel Genellina
> Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.

What he said is that you should apply the idea to the mixing of your thread of 
benchmarking with the thread of python development.

More information about the Python-list mailing list