Globals or objects?
tinnews at isbd.co.uk
tinnews at isbd.co.uk
Thu Feb 21 08:43:26 EST 2008
Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> wrote:
> In article <72b59db8-ec9c-480a-9ae7-92a69acb70a6 at 41g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
> <MartinRinehart at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >I had a global variable holding a count. One source Google found
> >suggested that I wouldn't need the global if I used an object. So I
> >created a Singleton class that now holds the former global as an
> >instance attribute. Bye, bye, global.
> >
> >But later I thought about it. I cannot see a single advantage to the
> >object approach. Am I missing something? Or was the original global a
> >better, cleaner solution to the "I need a value I can read/write from
> >several places" problem?
>
> The advantage of the global singleton is that it is a container;
> therefore, its contents are mutable and you don't need to keep using the
> ``global`` statement.
.... but you do keep having to use a longer reference to the value so
what have you won?
--
Chris Green
More information about the Python-list
mailing list