Return value of an assignment statement?
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Sat Feb 23 01:22:13 CET 2008
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:00:17 -0800, Aahz wrote:
> In article <47be994b$0$6538$426a34cc at news.free.fr>, Bruno Desthuilliers
> <bruno.42.desthuilliers at wtf.websiteburo.oops.com> wrote:
>>FWIW, it's IMHO a real wart - given Python's pretention at readability -
>>that augmented assignement has been implemented that way for lists.
> This was debated extensively when augmented assignment was created, and
> it was decided that practicality beat purity. It's just too convenient
> to be able to write
> L += ['foo']
> without rebinding L.
Wouldn't L.append('foo') or L.extend(['foo']) be even more convenient,
and have perfectly obvious behaviour without leading to the confusion of
Personally, I think the confusion of augmented assignments is not worth
the benefit of saving typing a couple of characters. I think Guido's
first decision, to leave += etc out of the language, was the right
More information about the Python-list