Details about pythons set implementation
siona at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Fri Jan 4 18:08:23 CET 2008
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic at xemacs.org> wrote:
>BTW if you're using C++, why not simply use std::set?
Because ... how to be polite about this? No, I can't. std::set is
crap. The implementation is a sorted sequence -- if you're lucky,
this is a heap or a C array, and you've got O(log n) performance.
But the real killer is that requirement for a std::set<T> is that
T::operator< exists. Which means, for instance, that you can't
have a set of complex numbers....
\S -- siona at chiark.greenend.org.uk -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
"Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
-- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump
More information about the Python-list