optional static typing for Python

Kay Schluehr kay.schluehr at gmx.net
Tue Jan 29 22:33:08 CET 2008


On 29 Jan., 17:00, "Chris Mellon" <arka... at gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the difficulty of statically analyzing Python, and the
> limitations you need to add for either static typing or type inference
> to be practical, I think that the real future for faster Python code
> is JIT, not static optimizations.

Python has a JIT right now - so why do you think it's Pythons "real
future"?




More information about the Python-list mailing list