Nikolaus at rath.org
Mon Jul 28 12:13:18 CEST 2008
"Diez B. Roggisch" <deets at nospam.web.de> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>>>From `pydoc os`:
>> symlink(src, dst)
>> Create a symbolic link pointing to src named dst.
>> Is there any reason why this is so deliberately confusing? Why is the
>> target of the symlink, the think where it points *to*, called the
>> `src`? It seems to me that the names of the parameters should be
> I used the command the other day, and didn't feel the slightest confusion.
> To me, the process of creating a symlink is like a "virtual copy".
> Which the above parameter names reflect perfectly.
Is this interpretation really widespread? I couldn't find any other
sources using it. On the other hand:
| ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
| In the 1st form, create a link to TARGET with the name LINK_NAME.
| A symbolic link merely contains a text string that is interpreted and
| followed by the operating system as a path to another file or
| directory. It is a file on its own and can exist independently of its
| target. If a symbolic link is deleted, its target remains unaffected.
| If the target is moved, renamed or deleted, any symbolic link that
| used to point to it continues to exist but now points to a
| non-existing file.
»It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority.
By definition, there are already enough people to do that.«
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
More information about the Python-list