Attack a sacred Python Cow
torriem at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 07:37:48 CEST 2008
Colin J. Williams wrote:
>> def fun( ., cat):
> I don't see the need for the comma in fun.
It (the entire first variable!) is needed because a method object is
constructed from a normal function object:
That's precisely the same as if you'd defined method inside of the class
to begin with. A function becomes a method when the lookup procedure in
the instance object looks up the attribute and returns (from what I
understand) essentially a closure that binds the instance to the first
variable of the function. The result is known as a bound method, which
is a callable object:
<bound method MyClass.testmethod of <__main__.instance object at xxx>>
How would this work if there was not first parameter at all?
In short, unlike what most of the implicit self advocates are saying,
it's not just a simple change to the python parser to do this. It would
require a change in the interpreter itself and how it deals with classes.
More information about the Python-list