paul at boddie.org.uk
Fri Mar 28 19:06:17 CET 2008
On 27 Mar, 15:19, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de... at nospam.web.de> wrote:
[Psyco maintenance and further development]
> Nope, but I heard through the grapevine that while it won't be supported for
> all times to come, a new version is in the making.
> But ultimately, the author says that the approach is flawed, so at *some*
> point it will be discontinued. But that could be said about nearly
> everything, couldn't it?
>From what I've seen from browsing publicly accessible materials,
there's a certain commercial interest in seeing Psyco updated
somewhat. So, whether it gets discontinued depends on the usual
factors of satisfying a need and there being qualified and motivated
people to work on it.
More information about the Python-list