Why prefer != over <> for Python 3.0?

Bjoern Schliessmann usenet-mail-0306.20.chr0n0ss at spamgourmet.com
Mon Mar 31 01:51:21 CEST 2008

Torsten Bronger wrote:

> Emacs is generally not regarded as being convenient, however, it
> has very strong input methods.  I type "\gtrless" and get "?",
> or "\forall" and get "?". 

I wonder where the point of this is. :) Why use fancy unicode chars
if they're not better to read (apart from not being readable with
every font) and require at least the same amount of keypresses?



BOFH excuse #123:

user to computer ratio too high.

More information about the Python-list mailing list