Why prefer != over <> for Python 3.0?
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Sun Mar 30 12:35:30 CEST 2008
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:13:04 -0700, dewitters wrote:
> On Mar 29, 6:34 pm, Lie <Lie.1... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You're forcing your argument too much, both != and <> are NOT standard
>> mathematics operators -- the standard not-equal operator is >< -- and I
>> can assure you that both != and <> won't be comprehensible to non-
> What I meant was that both < and > are standard mathematics operators,
> and that by that knowledge one could deduce what <> means.
But you would be wrong, because "less than or greater than" is not the
same as "not equal to".
>>> 3+2j != 2-3j
>>> (3+2j < 2-3j) or (3+2j > 2-3j)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: no ordering relation is defined for complex numbers
More information about the Python-list