Python 3.0 - is this true?

[rurpy at yahoo.com]

On Nov 10, 12:39 pm, George Sakkis <george.sak... at gmail.com> wrote:
George Sakkis wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2:21 pm, ru... at yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> So you could say that 3.0 is forcing us to acknowledge database
>>
>> > reality ;-)
>>
>> (Again) huh?
>> Reality in databases is that NULL *is* comparable.
>> "NULL==something" returns False, it doesn't raise an error.
>
> Given that in SQL "NULL `op` something" is False for all comparison
> operators (even NULL=NULL), raising an error seems a much lesser evil

s/False/NULL/.
Why is that evil?  It is logically consistent, and more importantly,
useful.

In Python, the logically consistent argument is a little weaker (not
having tri-state logic) but the useful argument certainly still seems
true.