If an OS was to be written in Python, how'w it look?
Mon Oct 6 18:22:18 CEST 2008
"Eric Wertman" <ewertman at gmail.com> writes:
> I'm no expert, but this would seem like a good example of something
> that python wasn't good for. I have always wondered, though, what a
> Linux kernel module would look like that had a python (or java, or
> whatever) interpreter running low-level, so the higher level
> components on the operating system could be implemented in an
> interpreted language. Is there any benefit to something like that?
> Or is that crap too? Again, I'm no expert.
This was done 20 years ago with the Lisp machine. Really, it was a
bold idea back then, but programming language and systems
understanding have comea long way since then. Best to keep using
Python as a scripting language; it's not the right thing for an OS.
More information about the Python-list