2.6, 3.0, and truly independent intepreters

Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sun Oct 26 01:29:38 CEST 2008

Glenn Linderman wrote:

> So your 50% number is just a scare tactic, it would seem, based on wild 
> guesses.  Was there really any benefit to the comment?

All I was really trying to say is that it would be a
mistake to assume that the overhead will be negligible,
as that would be just as much a wild guess as 50%.


More information about the Python-list mailing list