luke.leighton at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 13 11:09:01 CEST 2008
On Oct 7, 10:15 pm, Fuzzyman <fuzzy... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 2, 1:06 pm,lkcl<luke.leigh... at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 10:02 pm, bearophileH... at lycos.com wrote:
> > > Berco Beute:
> > it's been done. http://pyjamas.sf.net
someone _is_ considering validating the pyjs.py interpreter to ensure
that it's NP complete. however, it's an academic exercise that's not
driven by an actual real-world need.
basically, running pyjs.py and the standard python 2.5 "compile"
module under pyv8. just for kicks :)
so, the beginnings of the process - to bootstrap your way entirely
and it's not _as_ crazy as it sounds. sufficient tests to demonstrate
have pyv8 empirically demonstrating a ten times - TEN times for
goodness sake - performance increase - that's got to be worth it.
especially if it can be done "automagically", behind the scenes, so
that when you type "python myapp.py" instead of executing forth-like
> it's a
subversion - you'll need the llpamies branch, but you'll _also_ need
to go back to around sep 2007. somewhere in between then and now,
luis tried to add proper support for **kwargs and he didn't complete
> Still looks good though.
More information about the Python-list