better scheduler with correct sleep times

Carl Banks pavlovevidence at
Tue Oct 21 11:49:14 CEST 2008

On Oct 21, 4:58 am, sokol <tvrtko.sokolov... at> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2:19 am, greg <g... at> wrote:
> > sokol wrote:
> > > What was a surprise to me was that python makes the same
> > > mistake as I did in my first version.
> > The sched module is *not* designed for multithreading. It
> > assumes that the thread waiting for events is the only one
> > putting events into the queue, so it's impossible for an
> > event to get scheduled while in the midst of a sleep. It
> > also doesn't take any measures to protect its data structures
> > from concurrent access.
> > The documentation could make this clearer, especially since
> > it confusingly talks about "allowing other threads to run".
> I find that hard to believe. Scheduler in single threaded
> application is useless (well, you can correct me because
> right now I can't come up with an example). Also, the
> scheduler runs inside a loop. How do you suppose to
> run other code while the loop is executing? Remember, all
> you have is a single thread. The consequence of this is
> that the only way to insert something new inside a queue
> is by doing it from scheduled function.

Yeah, that does happen.

I often used this sort of thing (pre-Python days, so a long time ago)
in single-threaded, real-time simulations.

Don't know mcuh about the sched module, but time scheduling in general
doesn't need multithreading, not one bit.

Carl Banks

More information about the Python-list mailing list