2.6, 3.0, and truly independent intepreters

[Jesse Noller]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Andy O'Meara <andy55 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm a lousy writer sometimes, but I feel bad if you took the time to
> describe threads vs processes.  The only reason I raised IPC with my
> "messaging isn't very attractive" comment was to respond to Glenn
> Linderman's points regarding tradeoffs of shared memory vs no.
>

I actually took the time to bring anyone listening in up to speed, and
to clarify so I could better understand your use case. Don't feel bad,
things in the thread are moving fast and I just wanted to clear it up.

Ideally, we all want to improve the language, and the interpreter.
However trying to push it towards a particular use case is dangerous
given the idea of "general use".

-jesse