Will Python 3 be "stackless"?

[davy zhang]

multiprocessing is good enough for now,

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Diez B. Roggisch <deets at nospam.web.de> wrote:
> Phillip B Oldham schrieb:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Chris Rebert <clp at rebertia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, it will definitely not.
>>
>>> From your statement (and I'm terribly sorry if I've taken it out of
>>
>> context) it would seem that such features are frowned-upon. Is this
>> correct? And if so, why?
>
> You got the wrong impression. It's not frowned upon. It just is a lot of
> extra effort to implemnt & thus makes the development of "normal" features
> more complex.
>
> Diez
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>