lacking follow-through

castironpi castironpi at gmail.com
Sun Sep 7 23:00:30 CEST 2008


I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to
recent ideas I have described.  Do I merely have a wrong understanding
of group policy?  Is it a good policy (defined with respect to the
future of Python and the welfare of humans at large) if so?  Is there
a serious lack of diligence, or should I merely take more initiative,
and ignore charges of 'pestering'?  (Warning, moderately deep outside
social issues on table too.)



More information about the Python-list mailing list