Not fully OO ?

Patrick Mullen saluk64007 at
Mon Sep 29 02:11:50 CEST 2008

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Bruno Desthuilliers
<bdesth.quelquechose at> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:00:59 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>>> Patrick Mullen a écrit :
>>>> Depending on the scale of the website I am making, how much I care
>>>> about editing it in the future, and how much I just want to get
>>>> something up, I will occasionally use php.  And I am a self confessed
>>>> php hater :)  But it's generally the fastest way I know to get
>>>> something up.  So even terrible languages can have their uses!
>>> Sorry but I fail to see how it relates to the current thread ???
>> I think Patrick is responding to a comment from Tino Wildenhain:
> That didn't showed here (reading this from via Sorry.
>> [quote]
>> Well then it still depends on the perception of "job done". For example
>> PHP programmers would bet their soul that their language of choice is
>> exactly the right one to "get the job done." [end quote]
>> Patrick, you will cause much less confusion if you quote relevant parts of
>> the text you are replying too.
> Indeed. At least it would have made clear (to me) there was something
> missing in the thread...
> --

Whoops, sorry for the confusion everyone.  Usually I do keep the
comments, don't know what happened there.

More information about the Python-list mailing list