improving a huge double-for cycle

[Steven D'Aprano]

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:43:00 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:

> Now the obvious winner is pruebono - even unoptimized, using sets seems
> to be *way* faster than even the most optimized corrected version of
> your algorithm.

I'm not being snarky about losing priority here, but I submitted 
essentially the same solution two hours earlier than pruebono.

Are people not seeing my posts? Have I been kill-filed by everyone except 
Mensator? I also asked a question about HTTPError and I haven't seen any 
responses at all.


-- 
Steven