max(), sum(), next()
mwilson at the-wire.com
Sat Sep 6 17:03:10 CEST 2008
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:33:25 -0400, Manu Hack wrote:
>> Actually it's even more natural to state sum([x]) = x, and this way you
>> can never conclude that sum() = 0 from there.
> But what you can say is that for any list L, sum(L) = sum(L + ).
> Therefore sum() = sum( +) = 0
Yep. The way it is preserves the distributive property
sum(a+b) = sum(a) + sum(b)
This would matter in cases like (untested code..)
suvsales = sum (sum (s.price for s in d.sales if s.class='suv') for d in
More information about the Python-list