python needs leaning stuff from other language
google at mrabarnett.plus.com
Sat Apr 4 00:55:51 CEST 2009
Tim Wintle wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:12 -0400, Mel wrote:
>>>>> I think it would also be better to have One (and prefereably Only One)
>>>>> Obvious Way To Do It. That obvious way, for those who work with
>>>>> Python's ‘set’ and ‘dict’, is a ‘clear’ method. It seems best to have
>>>>> ‘list’ conform with this also.
>>>> Does that mean a one-off special case rule to forbid slices having a
>>> Why would it do that?
>> Well, if list.clear were truly and strictly to be the only way to clear the
>> contents of a list, then assigning nothing via the default slice would have
>> to be ruled out. `somelist[:] = ` is just a special case of assignment to
>> a slice generally.
> agreed. If .clear was to be added then really assignments to slices
> should be entirely removed.
Should we also remove .update from dict?
I see no problem in collections having a .clear method. Saying that "if
c is a collection then c.clear() clears that collection" seems to be a
very duck-typy(?) thing to me.
Assignments to slices is just a feature of ordered collections (well,
lists), and clearing a list by assigning an empty list is just a special
case of that.
More information about the Python-list