PEP 382: Namespace Packages
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Apr 4 14:24:34 CEST 2009
> My main concern is that we'll start seeing all kinds of packages with
> names like:
> The current lack of global package namespace effectively prevents
> bureaucratic package naming, which in my mind makes it worth the
> cost. However, I'd be willing to believe this can be kept under
> control some other way.
In principle, people can do this today already. That they are not
doing it is a good sign.
I think this bureaucratic naming in Java originates more from an
explicitly stated policy that people should use such naming than
from the ability to actually do so easily.
More information about the Python-list