Why is it that *dbm modules don't provide an iterator? (Language design question)
andrew at acooke.org
Fri Apr 10 01:19:33 CEST 2009
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I assumed there were some decisions behind this, rather than it's just
>> not implemented yet.
> I believe this assumption is wrong - it's really that no code has been
> contributed to do that.
But doesn't the issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue662923 imply that
there *was* suitable code (for 2.4)? So is this a regression? And should
that issue be re-opened?
> For gdbm, you can also use the firstkey/nextkey methods.
More information about the Python-list