[Python-Dev] PEP 382: Namespace Packages
James Y Knight
foom at fuhm.net
Wed Apr 15 19:38:19 CEST 2009
On Apr 15, 2009, at 12:15 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> The much more common use case is that of wanting to have a base
> installation which optional add-ons that live in the same logical
> package namespace.
> The PEP provides a way to solve this use case by giving both
> and users a standard at hand which they can follow without having to
> rely on some non-standard helpers and across Python implementations.
I'm not sure I understand what advantage your proposal gives over the
current mechanism for doing this.
That is, add to your __init__.py file:
from pkgutil import extend_path
__path__ = extend_path(__path__, __name__)
Can you describe the intended advantages over the status-quo a bit
More information about the Python-list