I can't get RLock to work (warning, the following code is pretty long)
Peter Otten
__peter__ at web.de
Fri Apr 10 11:39:53 EDT 2009
grocery_stocker wrote:
> On Apr 10, 6:48 am, Peter Otten <__pete... at web.de> wrote:
>> grocery_stocker wrote:
>> > When I run the following...
>>
>> > #!/usr/bin/python
>>
>> > import time
>> > import thread
>> > import threading
>>
>> > def get_first_part(string, lock, sleeptime, *args):
>> > global counter
>> > lock.acquire()
>> > try:
>> > counter = counter + 1
>> > data = counter
>> > print "%s value is %d" % (string, counter)
>> > time.sleep(sleeptime)
>> > finally:
>> > lock.release()
>> > return data
>> > def get_both_parts(string, lock, sleeptime, *args):
>> > global first, second
>> > lock.acquire()
>> > try:
>> > first = get_first_part()
>> > second = get_second_part()
>> > print "%s values are %d and %d" % (string, first,
>> > second)
>> > time.sleep(sleeptime)
>> > finally:
>> > lock.release()
>> > return first, second
>> > How come RLock isn't working in this example?
>>
>> When get_both_parts() acquires the lock it invokes get_first_part() which
>> tries to acquire the lock. This fails because get_both_parts() does not
>> release the lock until after get_first_part() has finished...
>>
>> Peter
>
>
> i thought a Rlock() (vs a Lock()) was suspposed to get around this
> kind of a problem.
Oops, yes. In get_both_parts() try calling get_first_part/get_second_part()
with the three necessary arguments...
Peter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list