question: why isn't a byte of a hash more uniform? how could I improve my code to cure that?
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Fri Aug 7 21:15:56 CEST 2009
László Sándor wrote:
> Thank you, Tim. My comments are below.
> On 2009-08-07 13:19:47 -0400, Tim Chase <python.list at tim.thechases.com>
>>> After I have written a short Python script that hashes my textfile
>>> line by
>>> line and collects the numbers next to the original, I checked what I
>>> Instead of getting around 25% in each treatment, the range is
>> That sounds suspiciously like 25% with a +/- 7% fluctuation one might
>> expect to see from non-random source data.
> Could you help me where this range comes from? (If all my lines were
> "42", I wouldn't hit this range. So it cannot be a rule. Right?)
>> Remember that your outputs are driven purely by your inputs in a
>> deterministic fashion -- if your inputs are purely random, then your
>> outputs should more closely match your expected bin'ing. If your
>> inputs aren't random, you get a taste of your own medicine ("my file
>> has just the number 42 on every line...why isn't my output random?").
>> And randomness-of-hash-output is a red herring since hashing is *not*
> Thanks, I tried to be correct with "pseudo-random". I understand that
> everything is dependent on input. I want it to be the case. However, I
> hoped that good hashes produce random-looking output from input with
> very little variation. It would be strange if I could not get more than
> 18% of lines with a remainder of 3 (after division by 4), whatever hash
> I try just because these are names of people.
>> Your input is also finite -- an aspect which leaves you a far cry from
>> the full hash-space. If an md5 has 32 bytes (256 bits) of data, your
>> input would have to cover 2**256 possible inputs to see the full
>> profile of your outputs. That's a lot of input :)
> OK, I understand. Could anyone suggest a better way to do this, then?
> (Recap: random-looking, close-to uniform assignment of one number out of
> four possibilities to strings.)
> Thanks, everyone.
Well, a very simplistic method is to use the length of the input string
modulus four. If the names have decently "random" lengths, that may work.
More information about the Python-list