Annoying octal notation
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Mon Aug 24 18:47:43 CEST 2009
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:14:25 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> Assuming I'm right about that, then the use of a leading 0 to represent
> octal actually predates the prevalence of using 0 in dates by almost two
> decades. And while using leading zeros in other contexts is "familiar"
> to me, I would certainly not consider it "common" by any means. Thus I
> think it's fair to say that when this syntax was selected, it was a
> rather good choice.
Except of course to anyone familiar with mathematics in the last, oh,
five hundred years or so. Mathematics has used a positional system for
numbers for centuries now: leading zeroes have been insignificant, just
like trailing zeroes after the decimal point:
9 = 09 = 009 = 9.0 = 9.00 = 0009.000 etc.
More information about the Python-list